Genetics & Lineage
Parentage not published by the breeder. No single parent pair is established for this catalog entry. Areto does not estimate parents it has no report of.
Effects
Aroma & Taste
Academic research (5 studies)
Peer-reviewed, open-access studies that examined samples sold or grown under this name. Findings describe those samples, not the breeder’s release, and may not match every product. Each quote is copied from the paper’s full text.
- Cannabinoids: A previously reported Felina 32 cultivar showed a higher CBD content than the samples analyzed in this study.
“whereas Felina 32 cultivar has shown a CBD content higher with respect to that here reported”
Ingallina C et al. (2020). Cannabis sativa L. Inflorescences from Monoecious Cultivars Grown in Central Italy: An Untargeted Chemical Characterization from Early Flowering to Ripening. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/molecules25081908
- Cannabinoids: Extracts from Felina 32 were CBD-dominated with low Δ9-THC (<0.3%), which the paper classes as chemotype III.high CBDchemotype III
“Both cultivars, Felina 32 and Futura 75, are characterized by high CBD content and simultaneously low Δ9-THC levels (<0.3%), classifying them as chemotype III.”
Haczkiewicz M et al. (2025). Phytochemical Profile, Extraction and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Industrial Hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i> L.) Felina 32 Variety. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/molecules30204148
- Cannabinoids: The paper states that Felina 32 reaches about 1.4% CBD with Δ9-THC at or below 0.2% dry weight, depending on harvest time.
“In the Felina 32 variety, depending on the harvest time, the CBD concentration reaches around 1.4%, while Δ9-THC content does not exceed 0.2% in dry weight.”
Haczkiewicz M et al. (2025). Phytochemical Profile, Extraction and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Industrial Hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i> L.) Felina 32 Variety. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/molecules30204148
- Terpenes: Felina 32 was grouped in a cluster whose reported dominant terpenes were myrcene, terpinolene, beta-phellandrene and (E)-ocimene.myrceneterpinolenebeta-phellandrene(E)-ocimene
“B | Fedora 17, 150, 13/08 (full flowering)Felina 32, 150, 27/08 (end of flowering)Futura 75, 150, 27/08 (full flowering) | 820.7 ± 171.9 | 2.3 | Myrcene, Terpinolene, Beta-phellandrene, (E)-ocimene”
André A et al. (2020). Evolution of the Polyphenol and Terpene Content, Antioxidant Activity and Plant Morphology of Eight Different Fiber-Type Cultivars of Cannabis Sativa L. Cultivated at Three Sowing Densities. Plants (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/plants9121740
- Terpenes: Citing prior studies, the paper reports limonene at around 0.4-0.5% in the essential oil of cv. Felina 32.
“Limonene concentration in the EO of cv. Felina 32 was around 0.4–0.5% [28,36]”
Zheljazkov VD et al. (2020). Grinding and Fractionation during Distillation Alter Hemp Essential Oil Profile and Its Antimicrobial Activity. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/molecules25173943
- Terpenes: Sesquiterpenes (E)-β-caryophyllene and α-humulene were predominant in the solvent extracts from Felina 32.(E)-β-caryophylleneα-humulene
“Similarly, in extracts from the Felina 32 cultivar, sesquiterpenes (E)-β-caryophyllene and α-humulene were also predominant.”
Haczkiewicz M et al. (2025). Phytochemical Profile, Extraction and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Industrial Hemp (<i>Cannabis sativa</i> L.) Felina 32 Variety. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). doi:10.3390/molecules30204148
- Terpenes: Felina 32 is reported to have a more pronounced β-caryophyllene-dominant terpene profile.
“Other cultivars, such as Felina 32 and Fedora 17, have been reported to exhibit more pronounced β-caryophyllene-dominant profiles”
Stoilkovska Gjorgievska V et al. (2026). From Wild-Growing Plants to Promising Candidates for Hemp Variety Development: Morphological and Phytochemical Characterization of Macedonian Cannabis sativa L. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). PMC13707986
Areto Research estimateNot published by the breeder. Areto Research estimated this with AI-assisted review of the strain’s name, reported parentage and commonly described traits; it is not a source, a lab result or a prediction for any product. Details marked “general guess” have low confidence. Each estimate is replaced as soon as a breeder publishes that detail.
Source access date not recorded. Fields without supporting records remain unknown. Potency and terpene composition vary by product batch; use that batch’s COA for tested values. View sources.
Indica, sativa and hybrid are retail shopping labels, not genetics. Parentage is breeder-reported and not DNA-verified. Use your product’s batch COA for tested potency. How Areto sources this page.
Direct breeder sources
No direct breeder citation is available for this entry.
Cultivar facts come directly from the cited breeders. A breeder’s description is a reported claim, not independent genetic verification or a test of your product batch. Community members’ personal experiences are separate from these facts. Corrections: genetics@areto.tech.